Helping you resolve disputes, protect property & fight cases
#LegalServices in Bangalore & Online | Property | Criminal | Family | Corporate | NRI | Your Legal Partner, Anytime. Anywhere
Latest Posts & Updates
Fresh stories, announcements and offers about Law Firm, Lawyer, Notary public, straight from our business.
Koramangala Lawyer
Indiranagar Lawyer Jayanagar Lawyer Whitefield Lawyer JP Nagar Lawyer HSR Layout Lawyer MG Road / Central Bengaluru Lawyer Bannerghatta Road Lawyer
Property Document Check-up in Bangalore
https://bestlegality.com
Divorce & Separation: Legal representation in both contested and uncontested divorces, drafting p…
Divorce & Separation: Legal representation in both contested and uncontested divorces, drafting petitions, negotiating settlements, and ensuring smooth proceedings. Child Custody & Visitation Rights: Advocacy to secure custody, guardianship, and parenting arrangements, always prioritizing the best interests of the child. Maintenance & Alimony: Assistance in claiming or defending spousal maintenance and child support, including enforcement of existing orders. Domestic Violence Cases: Legal remedies such as protection orders to ensure safety and justice for victims. Property & Matrimonial Asset Division: Guidance on equitable distribution of property, ancestral assets, and financial disputes. Mediation & Alternative Dispute Resolution: Encouraging peaceful settlements to minimize stress, delay, and litigation costs https://bestlegality.com If you are searching for a Family Lawyer in Bangalore, whether for divorce, custody, maintenance, or property issues, our team is here to support and represent you.
In Bangalore, property cases are usually filed before the City Civil Court or District Courts, an…
In Bangalore, property cases are usually filed before the City Civil Court or District Courts, and in some cases, they may go before the High Court of Karnataka. These matters can be resolved through: www.bestlegality.com
They provide comprehensive legal services for domestic and NRI clients worldwide with 24/7 online…
They provide comprehensive legal services for domestic and NRI clients worldwide with 24/7 online consultation capabilities covering multiple practice areas including Criminal Law Defense, Property Legal Services, Corporate Legal Solutions, Civil Litigation, NRI Legal Support, and Online Legal Consultation. https://bestlegality.com The firm has 15+ years of experience, over 500+ successful cases, and offers round-the-clock legal assistance through online consultations, WhatsApp chat, and phone support. https://bestlegality.com
Business update
Business update
Business update
Business update
“The cheque in question was not drawn or signed by my client. Section 138 applies only to the dra…
“The cheque in question was not drawn or signed by my client. Section 138 applies only to the drawer. Without being the drawer, liability cannot be extended.” Authority: SMS Pharmaceuticals v. Neeta Bhalla (2005) 8 SCC 89. 2. Loan, if any, was with the Company “The complainant herself admitted in cross-examination that the alleged transaction was with Accused No.1 Company. My client was only an employee, not a beneficiary. Even assuming liability, it is of the company and its signatory, not of this Appellant.” Authority: Aparna A. Shah v. Sheth Developers (2013) 8 SCC 71. 3. Defective Notice “The statutory notice, Ex.P5, was issued not by the complainant but by her husband, without any authorisation. Section 138(b) requires notice by the payee or holder in due course. Absence of valid notice vitiates the entire complaint.” Authority: K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan (1999) 7 SCC 510. 4. No Enforceable Debt “The complainant admitted that she never dealt with my client. She also failed to prove her financial capacity to lend such a sum. Existence of enforceable debt is a sine qua non under Section 138.” Authority: Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa (2019) 5 SCC 418. 5. Presumption Rebutted “Through cross-examination, we have raised a probable defence: (i) no cheque by accused, (ii) no privity of contract, (iii) defective notice, (iv) no financial capacity. As per Rangappa v. Sri Mohan (2010) 11 SCC 441, even a probable defence is sufficie